Hi Dean, Masato & all APNIC's NETmundial report is now live here:
http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2014/event-wrap-netmundial Thanks Tony On 29/04/2014 3:37 pm, "Dean Pemberton" <[email protected]> wrote: >I agree with Yamanishi-san. > >The document detailing the activities undertaken by APNIC at the >ICANN49 meeting are an excellent first step to articulating to >membership what the purpose and benefits are of this level of >engagement. > >As previously mentioned, I don't believe that the root of the issue is >business class travel or otherwise, I believe that it is demonstrating >to the membership, in a way that they accept, that the balance between >the expenditure and outcomes is appropriate. > >In order to do that, there must be transparency and a level of >detailed reporting across both areas. It is only then that the >membership can determine if they find the balance appropriate. > >To that end I would support an increased level of financial and >activity reporting along the lines Yamanishi-san has suggested. We do >see this increased reporting in RIRs and other multistakeholder >organisations and they are to be commended for this. >This will allow the membership to determine if outputs such as those >reported by APNIC at ICANN49 are balanced with the expenditure >required to produce them. > >With regard to NetMundial, the final output document is out for >comment, so I would expect a detailed assessment by members of the >APNIC delegation would be presented any time now. > >My favourate part of the document so far is: > >"Internet governance discussions would benefit from improved >communication and coordination between technical and non-technical >communities, providing a better understanding about the policy >implications in technical decisions and technical implications in >policy decision making." > >Ensuring that Internet Governance messages are reframed and >communicated in a way that the technical community finds easy to >access and engage with seems like something that APNIC is well placed >to do. > > >Regards > >-- >Dean Pemberton > >Technical Policy Advisor >InternetNZ >+64 21 920 363 (mob) >[email protected] > >To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. > > >On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Masato Yamanishi ><[email protected]> wrote: >> Paul and Tony, >> >> BTW, I think this page is more transparent than past APNIC announcement. >> >> http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2014/icann-49-event-wrapup >> >> So, can we expect similar announcement about NETmundial in last week? >> >> Thank you in advance. >> >> Rgs, >> Masato Yamanishi >> >> >> On 14/04/26 0:44, "Dave Mead" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Paul, >> >> Your speech at Asia Pacific Internet Leadership Program meeting is >>utterly >> disappointing to APNIC Members. >> >> http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2014/icann-49-event-wrapup >> >> You said, "...Members pay fees to APNIC to support the organisation and >>the >> services and they don't give APNIC a blessing to spend that money in >> unlimited fashion on Internet development..." >> >> http://audio.icann.org/meetings/singapore2014/apilp-22mar14-en.mp3 >> >> Members DID NOT BLESS APNIC to spend the fees on business class travel >>which >> costs 3 times more than an economy class ticket. The entire senior >> management, including your Executve Assistant and those who work for >>APNIC >> as consultants travel in business class contributing to the success of >>the >> airlines but clearly not Internet development in this region. >> >> http://www.apnic.net/about-APNIC/team >> >> Paul, you're leading a not-for-profit organisation not a comerncial >>entity >> that you and your senior management can erode member funds for your >> comfortable travels across the world. This is just outrageous and >> mismanagement of Member funds. >> >> Members like to see the Executive Council takes note of this and truely >> represent the Members to better manage their funds to contribute for the >> Internet development in this region. A lot of development work can be >>done >> if the funds are managed effectively not use for personal benefits. >> >> Best >> -Dave Mead >> >> _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> apnic-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk >> >_______________________________________________ >apnic-talk mailing list >[email protected] >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
