Hey Dean, Can you please remind me which policy number that was... clearly I missed something.
...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks Business [email protected] ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Dean Pemberton <[email protected]>wrote: > We still have DN for one reason and one reason only. > ARIN requires it as part of their transfer policy. > > We know this because the community already removed the requirement for DN > for IPv4 addresses post exhaustion once, and then quickly had to put it > back in because we stood to miss out on ARIN transfers. > > So to my mind the community has already spoken and this is what it has > said: > > "We don't want/care about DN for post exhaustion IPv4 addresses. We've > already voted to remove it once. We *DO* care about transfers from ARIN, > so we put DN back. Thats the only reason we have DN." > > So here you go community... am I wrong with that statement? > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Skeeve Stevens <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dean, >> >> I am simply asking for opinions so that when/if something happens in the >> other regions that the APNIC region has already discussed it, or at least >> had opening discussions. >> >> Do you think that we should avoid any discussion on the matter before >> something happens and be reactionary? or seek to open a discussion and get >> the feeling from the community? >> >> Lately there has been a lot of comments on involving the community >> more... which is what I am trying to facilitate by bringing up the topic. >> >> >> ...Skeeve >> >> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* >> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks Business >> [email protected] ; www.v4now.com >> >> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve >> >> facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> >> linkedin.com/in/skeeve >> >> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com >> >> >> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers >> >> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Dean Pemberton >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Too true Bill, >>> >>> For me the trigger points for any further conversation on DN are: >>> >>> ARIN changes or relaxes its policy on requiring DN for transfers. >>> *OR* >>> APNIC members decide they no longer need transfers from ARIN. >>> >>> I'm happy to talk about one of those things (the second), the first is >>> none of my business. >>> >>> >>> Dean >>> >>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > On May 18, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Skeeve Stevens <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> ARIN, RIPE and APNIC all have demonstrated need at present. >>> >> RIPE and ARIN are having discussions about removing or lowering the >>> bar. >>> > >>> > Well, RIPE is. I wouldn’t say that’s true of ARIN. I mean, there are >>> always people talking about stuff, but there’s a difference between people >>> talking and a policy proposal that has any support or chance of becoming >>> future policy. >>> > >>> > -Bill >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > apnic-talk mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Dean >>> _______________________________________________ >>> apnic-talk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk >>> >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > > Dean > > _______________________________________________ > apnic-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk > >
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
