> the TWGS, I'm willing to bet that that type of design would use > fewer support chips than using a cache based approach. Relatively > fast CPUs are also available today. You could write a 65816 CPU > emulator to run on a non-native processor, and still have enough > processing power available to take care of all of the house keeping > (eg. mirroring the relevant bits of RAM). > > Byron.
The TWGS is a cache based approach. There are ARM emulators that will do 6502 at 40mhz on a 60mhz ARM CPU. Rich -- Apple2list is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... / Buy books, CDs, videos, and more from Amazon.com \ / <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/lowendmac> \ Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Apple2list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/apple2.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:apple2list@mail.maclaunch.com> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/apple2list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> iPod Accessories for Less at 1-800-iPOD.COM Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal www.1800ipod.com
