L.D. Best wrote: > > Have to admit it -- I thought this was all so much bunk, of little > consequence, etc. > > Then I went and did a quick check, and was flabbergasted! I have DOS > 5.0 and 6.22, and both have HIMEM.SYS. The 5.0 version is about 11K, > while the 6.22 version is almost 30K!! That could be the difference > between being able to run Arachne and not being able to. Hi L.D.; Well, it looks like one more person may understand why I use DOS 3.3 instead of the latest FAT #%*@. I DO wish I could find an upgrade to 3.31 tho. - Clarence Verge -- - Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/ --
- HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Rebel
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Neil Parks
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Bernie
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? L.D. Best
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Clarence Verge
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions... Thomas Mueller
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different vers... Clarence Verge
- DOSLYNX Thomas Mueller
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Samuel W. Heywood
- HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Hans-Juergen
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Clarence Verge
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: HIMEM.SYS, are there different versions? Samuel W. Heywood
