L.D. Best wrote:
> 
> Have to admit it -- I thought this was all so much bunk, of little
> consequence, etc.
> 
> Then I went and did a quick check, and was flabbergasted!  I have DOS
> 5.0 and 6.22, and both have HIMEM.SYS.  The 5.0 version is about 11K,
> while the 6.22 version is almost 30K!!  That could be the difference
> between being able to run Arachne and not being able to.

Hi L.D.;

Well, it looks like one more person may understand why I use DOS 3.3
instead of the latest FAT #%*@.
I DO wish I could find an upgrade to 3.31 tho.

-  Clarence Verge
--
-  Help stamp out FATWARE.  As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--

Reply via email to