On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:30:25 +0100, Hans-Juergen Bardenhagen wrote:
> By the way, can you confirm that v1.60 b1 is much faster than v1.50src,
> even up to four times like someone wrote? I don't have the opportunity
> to test and compare Arachne with Windows browsers, so I just don't know -
> but I would like to...
Hello, Hans;
I seem to have missed your post and am quoting from Michael Dawley's reply.
There was no noticeable speed difference between 1.50s.r.c. and 1.50b2.
My posts of Jan 21, 22 compared 1.60b1 with 1.50b2, Opera and a very fast
version of Netscape, 2.02.
In all cases, except for local operations such as refresh and page up/dn,
Arachne 1.60b1 was measurably, but not dramatically, faster. If you were
to compare 1.60b1 with Netscape 4+ THEN you could say it is dramatically
faster. <G>
On local operations, 1.60b1 is measureably slower than 1.50b2 and MUCH slower
than Netscape 2.02.
If you want the details, just ask. I don't want to bore everyone by re-posting.
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
