On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:30:25 +0100, Hans-Juergen Bardenhagen wrote:
> By the way, can you confirm that v1.60 b1 is much faster than v1.50src,
> even up to four times like someone wrote? I don't have the opportunity
> to test and compare Arachne with Windows browsers, so I just don't know -
> but I would like to...
Hans,
1.60b1 seems faster in the processing of a downloaded page than 1.50src.
I doubt it's four times faster overall, however.
What I really like about 1.60 is the ease of setup, especially the
graphics. On this machine, arachne detected a vesa adapter, and I was
able to more accurately set up my graphics in Arachne as a result of
knowing that. My test images help me decide quickly if I have the
graphics correctly set up.
Thanks,
Michael L. Dawley
Pearl, Mississippi
-- Tandy 486DX-50 8 MB RAM with Aptiva 270 MB HDD --
-- Using Netdial 1.3 - Arachne 1.60 combination --
-- Arachne V1.60;b1, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
