Re: DJPEG 32-bit

[Eric S. Emerson]

Clarence Verge wrote:

>  <snip> ..........
>The tests: (On my 33Mhz '486 - 640x480x16shades)
>
>Setup:     Arachne 1.50b2   Arachne 1.6b1/DJPEG16   Arachne 1.6b1/DJPEG32
>Load and 
>Display JPG
> 11,322                              7                      5
> 33,235            15               14.5                    9
>185,935            26               24.6                   13.5
>
>When one removes the approx 3.5 sec it takes Arachne to paint the screen,
>these convert to:
>Load JPG
> 11,322                              3.5                    1.5
> 33,235                             11.0                    5.5
>185,935                             21.1                   10.0
>Which can be seen to be almost exactly twice as fast.
>
> <snip> .............

Hi Clarence & Bernie,
                       I tried DJPEG32 and found it converted
a jpeg to gif about twice as fast but it created a gif file
that was about 3 times as big as DJPEG16 creates. So, the
DJPEG32/gif took longer to read with Pictview than the
DJPEG16/gif. Picture quality looked equal.

Hardware: Gateway2000 4sx-33 with Intel Pentium overdrive
          1 mb video card - Trident

      Eric
 

--
             __________
            |  Ayrx |__\_       Eric S. Emerson
            | E-male:~_: !      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            `~(*)~~~~(*)~'      `````````````````````````