Glenn wrote:
>4) the DR-DOS disk cache (nwcache) works much better than smartdrv
Not IMHO, it can't hold as large cache as SmartDRV can. I think the same
applies to himem.sys - isn'r DR-DOS border at 32MB? (MS-DOS 6.x is at 64MB).
>5) it's cdrom access program (nwcdex) works better than mscdex
How do you mean "better"?
shsucdx is the one that uses the least amount of memmory - works just as
good as the other two IMHO - but I don't use my CD very often.
>6) the mouse drive (drmouse) is much better [loads high automatically]
Why not use the original ctmouse.com or ctmousep.com?
>7) the text editor works much smoother
(Hope you don't take it the wrong way): No way!
The Edit.Com/QBasic.Exe combination is *much* easier to use IMO (but DR-DOS
editor isn't as bad as the one that came with PC-DOS 6.x - that one was
just a little more userfriendly edlin disguised as a "normal" editor).
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS programs, Star Wars ...
