On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 13:26:33 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
> Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Other DR-DOS users here on the list are sure to chime-in.<g>
Glenn had posted to the list to enumerate some of the reasons why he prefers
DR-DOS over other DOS versions.
> More reasons:
<snip>
> 13)If you are install DR-DOS on a computer with Windows 95, a boot
> loader is installed to let you choose between DR-DOS or MS-Windows/MS-DOS
> boot the system, allowing you to have both OSs with little trouble.
> (though could be problematic if you allready got another boot loader
> like lilo)
Hey that sounds fantastic! I have a laptop with Windoze 95 installed on it.
I've always thought it would be nice to DR-DOS installed on it too. Of
course I don't like the pseudo-DOS that comes with Windoze 95. I want the
real thing.
Until I read this posting I had been under the impression that it would be
necessary to reformat my hard drive in such a manner to provide separate
partitions, one for DR-DOS and the other for Windoze 95. Do you mean I don't
even have to suffer resorting to such a hassle? Do you mean I can just
install DR-DOS on a computer already having Windoze 95 installed and then set
up a dual-boot system?
Fabulous!
Can you recommend a FAQ having some instructions on how I might proceed to
do that?
Or, this is truly a most interesting post. Thanks for letting us all know
about this.
Sam Heywood
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client
