Clarence wrote:
>Thanks, It doesn't matter now - I already hacked Insight.exe.
>I hope you (and Bernie) don't mind too much.
>I can't be bothered to learn enough "C" to fix it that way.
Isn't it harder to go in and change the code after it's been compiled?
In C all you would need to do is to move a part of the HTML from one line
to another.
>Unngh. Darn. There goes the neighborhood. Do we (I) talk too much ?
Or is it me? (Atleast I don't use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as my normal e-mail
address <g>).
>Actually, a lot of traffic could be moved to Arachne Chat if you could get
>Robin to fix one thing. Often, 49 messages is not enough to get back to
>some point you might have missed. Downloading ALL is out of the question.
You can specify any ammount you want (this was explained on chat.arachne.cz
some time ago - probably out of range now <g>).
Still I don't like the chat very much since I can't compose a message when
off-line (ok, also possible, but hard and inconvenient). But HTML is slow
and not as good for all-round use as text (e-mail) is.
>Could you get him (her) to add ONE option: Specify a range of messages ?
>i.e minus 151 to minus 121 !
That would perhaps be better.
(And it's him; Robin = Robert Polak)
