On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 some message from Bernie appeared before me saying, >IMO this *must* be wrong, with the * you specify "the rest" - and specifing >it twice can't be correct since you can only have one "the rest". I can't >understand what they are therefor anyway since there's nothing (useful) in >the frames at all. Maybe if you use multiple *, the total rest space will be divided among the number of *'s ? It's just a theory, but what if it should work like this, let's go take a look at my O'Reilly books about HTML.. <tralalal taking a peek in my books> Jups.. my O'Reilly book says the same (all information in their is based on W3C's HTML/4.0 specs) -- Cliff Albert | IRCNet: #wan99, #linux.nl, #ne2000, #cafeetje [EMAIL PROTECTED] | UnderNet: #groningen ICQ: 18461740
- Re: Memory allocation error Dale Mentzer
- Re: Memory allocation error Howard Eisenberger
- Re: Memory allocation error Clarence Verge
- Re: Memory allocation error Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Memory allocation error Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Memory allocation error Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Memory allocation error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory allocation error Glenn McCorkle
- re: Memory Allocation Error Gregory J. Feig
- re: Memory Allocation Error Bernie
- re: Memory Allocation Error Cliff Albert
- re: Memory Allocation Error Bernie
- Memory Allocation error Neil Parks
- Memory Allocation error Richard Menedetter
- Re: Memory Allocation error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation error Glenn McCorkle
- Memory Allocation error Richard Menedetter
- Memory Allocation Error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation Error Clarence Verge
- Re: Memory Allocation Error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation Error L.D. Best
