Cliff Albert wrote: >Maybe if you use multiple *, the total rest space will be divided among >the number of *'s ? It's just a theory, but what if it should work like >this, let's go take a look at my O'Reilly books about HTML.. <tralalal >taking a peek in my books> Jups.. my O'Reilly book says the same (all >information in their is based on W3C's HTML/4.0 specs) Ok (but this was news to me), is there any lower limit on the size? As it is now a 640*480 screen will not have enough room for these two frames - so perhaps that's the problem? //Bernie http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS programs, Star Wars ...
- Re: Memory allocation error Howard Eisenberger
- Re: Memory allocation error Clarence Verge
- Re: Memory allocation error Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Memory allocation error Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Memory allocation error Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Memory allocation error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory allocation error Glenn McCorkle
- re: Memory Allocation Error Gregory J. Feig
- re: Memory Allocation Error Bernie
- re: Memory Allocation Error Cliff Albert
- Memory Allocation error Bernie
- Memory Allocation error Neil Parks
- Memory Allocation error Richard Menedetter
- Re: Memory Allocation error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation error Glenn McCorkle
- Memory Allocation error Richard Menedetter
- Memory Allocation Error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation Error Clarence Verge
- Re: Memory Allocation Error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation Error L.D. Best
- Re: Memory Allocation Error Clarence Verge
