Hi
09 Nov 2000, Clarence Verge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> CV> It also seems like a way to control EXACTLY what people see.
>> CV> Differing screen resolutions could present some difficulty in
>> CV> today's marketplace, but who knows what the future might bring
>> CV> ?
>> Sorry ... but this is exactly the WRONG !!! way ....
>> HTML was invented to be independant of displays !!!
CV> And THAT is exactly why I hate HTML
you hate HTML in webpages ???
CV> and proportion fonts. :(
ok ... I hate them as well ...
CV> Look at it this way %-) : Once we were able to control formatting.
CV> Now we can't control formatting. Why can't we have BOTH ?
What do you mean exactly ??
HTML can be displayed using Netscape in a 1600*1200 window, and it can be
displayed on a small embedded system using some small monochrome display.
(like the new linux based palm called agenda ...)
This is IMHO _THE_ way to go !!
CV> Your points on "keep alive" are worth pursuing.
CV> I'll try to find out what the ramifications are.
Maybe Michael can answer what keeps him from implementing it ...
(the idea was discussed already earlier)
(PS: What are ramifications ?)
> From : Clarence Verge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09 Nov 2000 15:48
> Subj : Re: Arachne & ADSL
> Richard Menedetter wrote:
> > TM> I believe DSL can be by DHCP,
> > TM> but DSL providers are leaning toward PPPoE.
> > You mix up things ....
[...]
> ADSL
> TM
> DSL
[...]
Could you please explain what this message meant ...
> SWMSHBFFRSWPBB !!
???
CV> - Clarence Verge
CU, Ricsi
--
Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ: 7659421] {RSA-PGP Key avail.}
-=> He who laughs last is probably your boss! <=-
