Richard Menedetter wrote:
>
> CV> Look at it this way %-) : Once we were able to control formatting.
> CV> Now we can't control formatting. Why can't we have BOTH ?
> What do you mean exactly ??
> HTML can be displayed using Netscape in a 1600*1200 window, and it can be
> displayed on a small embedded system using some small monochrome display.
> (like the new linux based palm called agenda ...)
>
> This is IMHO _THE_ way to go !!
Ok, fine. But there is no reason it should be the ONLY way.
Have you heard of re-sizable gifs ? <g>
> CV> Your points on "keep alive" are worth pursuing.
> CV> I'll try to find out what the ramifications are.
> Maybe Michael can answer what keeps him from implementing it ...
> (the idea was discussed already earlier)
> (PS: What are ramifications ?)
Good points/bad points/cause and effect/tradeoffs:
i.e. Available time to do it that must be diverted from jscrap development,
size and stability issues, figuring out how to do it....
That is, EVERYTHING. <g>
> Could you please explain what this message meant ...
> > SWMSHBFFRSWPBB !!
> ???
I shouldn't have to explain. There are probably 1000 times as many people
on the planet that could decode that message as could understand all the
acronyms that were in the post I replied to.
I was just (apparantly successfully) making a point.
It is also a real message. Take a look in personal ads section of any large
North American newspaper. <G> Don't know about Europe.
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
