On 7/28/05, Dimitrios Apostolou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I understand the procedure, if people like it and vote it, it will be > included in the community repository. The reason I mention it in this > list is that I think such a package is important enough to be in current > or extra. Do you agree or disagree?
Just because something is important to *you* doesn't mean it's intrinsically important. I mean, I can sit here and say "WMII is the best WM - I say we remove all other WMs from current/extra and only use WMII, because it's that important", but that doesn't make it true. Obviously this package can't be that important because: a) I've honestly never heard of it and can't even bring myself to care enough to click the link b) No one has brought this up yet in all the history of Arch On 7/28/05, Martin Lefebvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well... I'm no advocate of the procedures involved with the AUR.... > they actually are one of the reasons why I left Arch... the other one > is that phrakture left me for some young 20y/o fluff with blue eyes > and blond hair :( Oh honey, you're the only one for me! _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
