Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On May 31, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Essien Ita Essien wrote: > >> Benoit Chesneau wrote: >>> On May 31, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Bruno RENIÉ wrote: >>> >>>> Le Thu, 31 May 2007 18:17:10 +0200, >>>> Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >>>>> I already made a proposal in my last mail. As I did 9 months ago. >>>>> This >>>>> is the only one you will have from me. This is a good proposition >>>>> anyway so let them answer. >>>>> >>>>> Btw I don't need any mediator or something like it. I don't do any >>>>> politic, >>>>> They are enough aged to answer themselves. >>>> Maybe you don't need a mediator, but it's not only *your* problem, >>>> it's >>>> the problem of every french archuser (I am one of them). Like >>>> Aaron I >>>> don't care why you are "fighting", who started, who is right etc. >>>> The fact is that the FR community is split and it's not a good >>>> situation. >>>> >>>> Just my two cents. BTW I don't use any of the french sites. If there >>>> were only one, I would probably do. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Bruno >>>> ______________________________________________ >>> >>> Why should I need any mediator. The problem is easy to solve if only >>> some guy of archlinux.fr answer. >> you think its easy like that? i wonder why this *easy* problem hasn't >> *solved* itself yet. I appreciate your down-to-earth-ness (ooo... >> fancy >> enlish word :) ), but when feelings are too heated... then a >> mediator is >> usually needed... >> >> In the life do you take a mediator >>> to solve a problem ? That's ridiculous. >> No its not. It just means that you're willing to let someone else take >> charge of solving the problem, and that you're ready to accept that >> not >> everything will turn out the way *you* want them to. >> >> we did this in Engineering school in a 4th year course called >> Engineering Management... a professional mediator is called an >> 'Arbitrator'. If big companies do it in real life... i wonder why you >> would think its ridiculous. >> >> I really wish you would accept a mediator... then the person >> (thankfully >> Leif has stepped up), would take the responsibility of getting a >> comment >> from the *others*. I'm almost certain they won't respond to your >> comments, but they *will* most likely talk to a mediator. >> >> Please let go of your personal preferences to move this thing forward. >> >> cheers, >> Essien >> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> arch mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > > In the the life a problem is solved between 2 parts. In these case > (because for you it's a case, i guess), > I don't need any fiucking mediator. I made a proposal, someone ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ /me washes hands off and goes back to coding.
> answer, propose and then we discuss. > This is like it should be, and like I want it. first I would like to > see one guy from archlinux.fr answer. Then let > see. That's not so hard. This is just a question of maturity. > > > Benoît > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
