On 5/31/07, Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 31, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Bruno RENIÉ wrote: > > > Le Thu, 31 May 2007 18:17:10 +0200, > > Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > >> > >> I already made a proposal in my last mail. As I did 9 months ago. > >> This > >> is the only one you will have from me. This is a good proposition > >> anyway so let them answer. > >> > >> Btw I don't need any mediator or something like it. I don't do any > >> politic, > >> They are enough aged to answer themselves. > > > > Maybe you don't need a mediator, but it's not only *your* problem, > > it's > > the problem of every french archuser (I am one of them). Like Aaron I > > don't care why you are "fighting", who started, who is right etc. > > The fact is that the FR community is split and it's not a good > > situation. > > > > Just my two cents. BTW I don't use any of the french sites. If there > > were only one, I would probably do. > > > > Cheers, > > Bruno > > ______________________________________________ > > > Why should I need any mediator. The problem is easy to solve if only > some guy of archlinux.fr answer. In the life do you take a mediator > to solve a problem ? That's ridiculous.
To answer your question - it is an emphatic "yes". For irreconcilable differences, as these appear to be, a mediating party is _always_ included. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
