On May 31, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Essien Ita Essien wrote: > Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> On May 31, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Bruno RENIÉ wrote: >> >>> Le Thu, 31 May 2007 18:17:10 +0200, >>> Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >>>> I already made a proposal in my last mail. As I did 9 months ago. >>>> This >>>> is the only one you will have from me. This is a good proposition >>>> anyway so let them answer. >>>> >>>> Btw I don't need any mediator or something like it. I don't do any >>>> politic, >>>> They are enough aged to answer themselves. >>> Maybe you don't need a mediator, but it's not only *your* problem, >>> it's >>> the problem of every french archuser (I am one of them). Like >>> Aaron I >>> don't care why you are "fighting", who started, who is right etc. >>> The fact is that the FR community is split and it's not a good >>> situation. >>> >>> Just my two cents. BTW I don't use any of the french sites. If there >>> were only one, I would probably do. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Bruno >>> ______________________________________________ >> >> >> Why should I need any mediator. The problem is easy to solve if only >> some guy of archlinux.fr answer. > > you think its easy like that? i wonder why this *easy* problem hasn't > *solved* itself yet. I appreciate your down-to-earth-ness (ooo... > fancy > enlish word :) ), but when feelings are too heated... then a > mediator is > usually needed... > > In the life do you take a mediator >> to solve a problem ? That's ridiculous. > > No its not. It just means that you're willing to let someone else take > charge of solving the problem, and that you're ready to accept that > not > everything will turn out the way *you* want them to. > > we did this in Engineering school in a 4th year course called > Engineering Management... a professional mediator is called an > 'Arbitrator'. If big companies do it in real life... i wonder why you > would think its ridiculous. > > I really wish you would accept a mediator... then the person > (thankfully > Leif has stepped up), would take the responsibility of getting a > comment > from the *others*. I'm almost certain they won't respond to your > comments, but they *will* most likely talk to a mediator. > > Please let go of your personal preferences to move this thing forward. > > cheers, > Essien > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> arch mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
In the the life a problem is solved between 2 parts. In these case (because for you it's a case, i guess), I don't need any fiucking mediator. I made a proposal, someone answer, propose and then we discuss. This is like it should be, and like I want it. first I would like to see one guy from archlinux.fr answer. Then let see. That's not so hard. This is just a question of maturity. Benoît _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
