To me, the terms are near synonyms, but if anything....sustainable use as it relates to IPv4 suggests that we intend to continue the use of IPv4 in perpetuity....which I am against. Conservation as a principle suggests again to me..that we carefully allocate/assign through technical/documented/justified need until the resource is no longer available or practicable.... Just my gut response to the terms difference.
bd On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams < [email protected]> wrote: > On 7/8/13 3:40 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > I think the principle is: sustainable use > > of number resources. Conservation is one tool which facilitates > > sustainable use in some circumstances. Technical/documented/justified > > need is another such tool. Retaining conservation as the core > > principle, we'll end up dancing around the stewardship issue a lot > > more often that we really ought to. > > +1. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
