On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Bill Darte <[email protected]> wrote: > To me, the terms are near synonyms,
Hi Bill, They're not, as you prove in the rest of the sentence: > but if anything....sustainable use as it > relates to IPv4 suggests that we intend to continue the use of IPv4 in > perpetuity.... Perpetuity, no. Indefinitely, yes. IMO, our job with a given number resource isn't done until the protocols using that resource are abandoned. From where I sit, declaring it over merely because the initial free pool has been exhausted would be rather a gross failure in stewardship. Meh, we did the best we could with conservation. Not our problem any more. See ya! Except it isn't "see ya." With IPv4 depletion we continue registration and are fine-tuning transfer processes. Why are we doing that if the job is not about sustainable use? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
