Owen, I would be extremely grateful if you would be kind enough to take charge of introducing the removal of needs testing for /20 and longer as a policy proposal.
Please keep in mind we're still talking about this on the ARIN-2014-17 thread which is a different proposal :) Thanks, Jeff On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Gary Buhrmaster <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > ..... >> Actually, I believe that this circumstance is the reason that the immediate >> needs clause >> exists. > > "Immediate need" occurred to me, too, but as the > NRPM can be a bit "dense" to parse, I had not had > time to review if it properly applies. I am glad someone > has more time (and experience) to parse the NRPM. > > ..... > >> If people support the idea above, I'm happy to put it into a policy template >> and get it started in the process. If there is strong support, it can >> probably be moved through the process fairly quickly. > > The devil is in the details, but this does, indeed, > sound like the correct change to resolve what > appears to one of those practical issues in real > work networks that I support. > > Gary > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. -- Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP Fellow, Black Lotus Communications mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: [email protected] | skype: blacklotus.net _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
