John, With that said, small ISP's have much to gain with this proposal and large ISP's, very little.
Thanks, Jeff On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Jeffrey Lyon <[email protected]> > wrote: >> It is still a non-issue as they're only going to get a 3 month supply, >> which pales in comparison to the space they actually have available. >> The administrative overhead of making this request is highly >> prohibitive. > > That may be the case; it depends on additional factors such how well > organized the ISP is with respect to their address block recordkeeping, > cost of obtaining address space on the transfer market, etc. > > The proposal would make it possible for some ISPs (large and small) to > request additional space who may not otherwise be able due to difficulty > in reaching full utilization of past address blocks. > > For larger ISP's, there is potentially diminishing returns given that > there is significant documentation necessary regarding the utilization > of all their previous allocations (However, this is slightly offset > as their utilization rate is higher, therefore providing a larger > relatively-sized block allocation based on their 3 month usage..) > > Hope this helps, > /John > > John Curran > President and CEO > ARIN > -- Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP Fellow, Black Lotus Communications mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: [email protected] | skype: blacklotus.net _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
