On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Milton L Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Why would you take an ARIN-centric approach? How about an Internet-centric > approach? How about an efficiency-centric or public interest-centric approach? > > Isn't it more efficient - both for the public and for the affected companies > - for legitimate holders of numbers to be able to move resources to wherever > they are most needed?
Only if it can be done without loopholes, corruption and gamesmanship. That would require a global approach not just to transfer policies but to the free pools and IPv4 addressing policy overall. Convert ARIN to truly be the "administrative convenience" John describes, an organization which adheres to external policies rather than making its own. I can't begin to imagine a transfer-only approach to globalizing address management which would not lead pretty directly to practices a reasonable outside observer would consider corrupt. Certainly the one on the table is unclean. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
