On May 27, 2015, at 12:17 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:06 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: >> You have a reasonable argument for why there should be globally-coordinated >> policy in this area. If you need any assistance when developing your >> proposal, >> please reach out to the ARIN Advisory Council for assistance. Ultimately, >> it is up >> to the globally community whether a globally uniform transfer policy is >> desirable. > > Hi John, > > Respectfully, we have barely a weak consensus, if that, on what the > transfer policies should be within the region.
That may be the case. > There is wide disagreement as to whether transfers should have any form of > needs > testing save for the movement of tender. In that environment it makes sense > to pursue > globally coordinated consensus on transfer policies? Surely you jest. Bill - You indicated that the present state was distinctly worse that having globally coordinated policy; I pointed out that the community had the ability to define globally coordinated policy if desired (and offered you assistance if needed.) If the community cannot come together in consensus on globally coordinated policy, then your observation about the present state being worse than a global policy approach doesn’t really matter, and you can disregard my note. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
