I could support a policy that allows you to transfer them to your own entity out of region for this purpose if there were some language that prevented subsequent flipping.
However, the policy as proposed creates too much opportunity for unintended consequences that the original anti-flip language is intended to prevent. Owen > On May 26, 2015, at 10:30 PM, David Huberman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Why is another region's policy problem or restrictions something that needs >> fixing through ARIN policy? > > Two answers: > > Because ARIN-region networks, subject to ARIN's NRPM, need to be able to move > IP addresses out of region where and when they're needed. > AND > Because ARIN policy currently prohibits staff from counting out-of-region use > as part of justification for a request. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
