What will be your opinion if I amend this proposal, so it works for both IPv4 
and IPv6, having this text in section 2.5 (Allocate and Assign), make it 
shorter and more generic:

 

“A unique IPv4 or IPv6 address or a unique IPv6 /64 prefix, which is 
non-permanently provided to third parties, shall not be considered an 
assignment”

 

Alternatively, if we don’t want to go so far as to define the “size”:

 

“An IPv4 or IPv6 block of address, which is non-permanently provided to third 
parties, shall not be considered an assignment”

 

I didn’t found short-term defined in the NRPM. Do you still think we need to 
define “permanently” ? I think saying non-permanently it is quite obvious, but 
maybe folks disagree …


Regards,

Jordi

 

 

De: ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> en nombre de Jo Rhett 
<[email protected]>
Fecha: miércoles, 9 de mayo de 2018, 20:37
Para: <[email protected]>
CC: <[email protected]>
Asunto: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on IPv6 
Sub-Assignments

 

"Nominative, verb indirect" isn't English ;) Clean english structure would be:

"A unique address or a unique /64 prefix that is non-permanently provided to 
third parties shall not be considered an assignment. "


Or if you really want a descriptive phrase that modifies the nominative you can 
get commas like so:



"A unique address or a unique /64 prefix, which is non-permanently provided to 
third parties, shall not be considered an assignment."

I would also argue that this phrase is very vague unless "permanently" is 
defined elsewhere in the document. Wasn't there some phrasing around short-term 
assignment? (sorry, too busy/too lazy to grab the entire doc right now)

 

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 6:40 PM Andrew Dul <[email protected]> wrote:

I'd like to suggest that the proposed policy text be shorted and clarified.  I 
don't believe all the examples are necessary in the definition section.

Add to the end of NRPM Section 2.5 - https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#two5

Current draft text: 

The fact that a unique address or even a unique /64 prefix is non-permanently 
provided to third parties, on a link operated by the original receiver of the 
assignment, shall not be considered a sub-assignment. This includes, for 
example, guests or employees (devices or servers), hotspots, and point-to-point 
links or VPNs. The provision of addressing for permanent connectivity or 
broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment. Only the addressing of 
the point-to-point link itself can be permanent and that addressing can't be 
used (neither directly or indirectly) for the actual communication. 

My suggested rewrite:

A unique address or a unique /64 prefix that is non-permanently provided to 
third parties, shall not be considered an assignment. 

 

On 4/24/2018 11:57 AM, David Farmer wrote:

I note that the text in question is the subject of an editorial change that the 
AC has recently forwarded to Board for review, at a minimum the policy text 
need to be updated to account for this editorial change. Further, I do not 
support the text as written.

I support a change to section 2 that is not quite so IPv6 specific and focused 
more on the idea that providing hotspot, guest access, or other such temporary 
access does not necessitate the making of re-assignments from a policy 
perspective.  Furthermore, such uses are not in conflict with the conditions of 
an assignment (made by ARIN) or re-assignment (made by an ISP or LIR). Also, If 
the details of RFC8273 need to be mentioned at all, they should be someplace in 
section 6, not in section 2, the definitions of assign, allocate, re-assign and 
re-allocate should remain agnostic about IP version.

Thanks.     

 

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:22 PM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote:

On 18 April 2018 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-254: 
Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments" as a Draft Policy.

Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4 is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2018_4.html

You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will evaluate 
the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft policy with 
ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy 
Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:

 * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
 * Technically Sound
 * Supported by the Community

The PDP can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

Regards,

Sean Hopkins
Policy Analyst
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)



Draft Policy ARIN-2018-4: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

Problem Statement:

When the policy was drafted, the concept of assignments/sub-assignments did not 
consider a practice very common in IPv4 which is replicated and even amplified 
in IPv6: the use of IP addresses for point-to-point links or VPNs.

In the case of IPv6, instead of unique addresses, the use of unique prefixes 
(/64) is increasingly common.

Likewise, the policy failed to consider the use of IP addresses in hotspots, or 
the use of IP addresses by guests or employees in Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) 
and many other similar cases.

Finally, the IETF has recently approved the use of a unique /64 prefix per 
interface/host (RFC8273) instead of a unique address. This, for example, allows 
users to connect to a hotspot, receive a /64 such that they are “isolated” from 
other users (for reasons of security, regulatory requirements, etc.) and they 
can also use multiple virtual machines on their devices with a unique address 
for each one (within the same /64).

Section 2.5 (Definitions/Allocate and Assign), explicitly prohibits such 
assignments, stating that “Assignments... are not to be sub-assigned to other 
parties”.

This proposal clarifies this situation in this regard and better define the 
concept, particularly considering new uses of IPv6 (RFC8273), by means of a new 
paragraph.

5.    Policy Statement

Actual Text

•    Assign - To assign means to delegate address space to an ISP or end-user, 
for specific use within the Internet infrastructure they operate. Assignments 
must only be made for specific purposes documented by specific organizations 
and are not to be sub-assigned to other parties.

New Text

•    Assign - To assign means to delegate address space to an ISP or end-user, 
for specific use within the Internet infrastructure they operate. Assignments 
must only be made for specific purposes documented by specific organizations 
and are not to be sub-assigned to other parties.

The fact that a unique address or even a unique /64 prefix is non-permanently 
provided to third parties, on a link operated by the original receiver of the 
assignment, shall not be considered a sub-assignment. This includes, for 
example, guests or employees (devices or servers), hotspots, and point-to-point 
links or VPNs. The provision of addressing for permanent connectivity or 
broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment. Only the addressing of 
the point-to-point link itself can be permanent and that addressing can't be 
used (neither directly or indirectly) for the actual communication.



6.    Comments

a.    Timetable for implementation:

Immediate

b.    Anything else:

Situation in other regions: This situation, has already been corrected in RIPE, 
and the policy was updated in a similar way, even if right now there is a small 
discrepancy between the policy text that reached consensus and the RIPE NCC 
Impact Analysis. A new policy proposal has been submitted to amend that, and 
the text is the same as presented by this proposal at ARIN. Same text has also 
been submitted to AfriNIC, LACNIC and APNIC.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.



 

-- 

===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[email protected]
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota   
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================



_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
 

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving 
this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List 
([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: 
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] 
if you experience any issues. 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to