Hi Owen,

So, you believe that if an ARIN member is repeatedly misusing the resources 
from another member, is just fine and the ARIN membership which rules are the 
policies, should not care about this behavior and members should not get their 
exclusive rights to use their allocated resources protected by policies?

In other words. Will you at least support something in the line of:
"The resources are allocated for the exclusive use of the recipient. 
Consequently, other members can't use them (unless authorized by the legitimate 
resource-holder) and not following this rule is a policy violation".

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

El 26/4/19 22:34, "ARIN-PPML en nombre de Owen DeLong" 
<[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió:

    Speaking only in my role as a member of the community and not in any way 
representing the AC...
    
    I do not support the petition. 
    
    There is always tension on the border between what is in scope of ARIN 
policy as regards running the registry and providing good stewardship of 
community resources vs. interfering in the operations of the internet (e.g. 
being the routing police). 
    
    While ARIN has a history of minimum allocation sizes in part dictated by 
community concerns over routing table growth, that is no longer the case. The 
current minimums reflect ARIN’s DNS and RPKI based limitations. 
    
    Another thing to consider is that ARIN policies only apply to those 
entities receiving resources from ARIN and in some cases by extension to those 
they grant resources to through reallocation or reassignment. 
    
    People hijacking prefixes, generally, are operating outside of those 
parameters to begin with, so it’s not really clear to me how such a policy 
provides any benefit in combatting the situation. 
    
    Instead, it creates an appearance that ARIN has some role as arbiter of the 
routing tables which is not only well outside of ARIN’s mandate, but also 
nearly impossible for ARIN to fulfill. 
    
    I believe the proposal is out of scope, but even if it were somehow 
considered in scope, I see no way in which it provides anything but additional 
risk to the organization while failing to offer any actual benefit to the 
community. 
    
    Owen
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    ARIN-PPML
    You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
    the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
    Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
    https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
    Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to