On 2 May 2019, at 11:35 AM, William Herrin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:50 PM Fernando Frediani 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Why people always believe they "own" IP address space and nobody can
take it from them as if it was a router or a server purchased with a
invoice and declared in their annual balance ?

Several reasons.

1. Revocation of a properly registered address space has never happened before, 
at least not in North America. The few times any sort of revocation has 
happened is when there was provable fraud in the -original- application, 
ownership was claimed by someone who was provably acting without the 
authorization of the original registrant, or periodic registratino fees 
consented to under written contract with ARIN were not paid for an extended 
period of time. Over ARIN's existence there have been plenty of opportunities 
for ARIN to revoke addresses for other bad behaviors including violations of 
the policy manual. They have always declined to do so.

The legal Doctrine of Laches more or less says that a right not enforced is a 
right you do not have, regardless of writings to the contrary. ARIN has never 
enforced a claim incompatible with the registrants' ownership of their IP 
addresses.

2. Prior to 1997, the documents associated with registration neither expressed 
nor implied any right for the registry to revoke a registration for any reason.

3. If it quacks like a duck, it's a duck. The registrant has exclusive control 
of the block of the number resource to the extent that use by anyone else on 
the Internet is universally held to be abusive. They can be sold or rented 
without permission or attachment and bought with minimal registration paperwork 
(or none if you're willing to operate on a contract with the averred registrant 
rather than updating the registration). Addresses are used in a manner that 
closely aligns with the common law understanding of an intellectual property. 
For a court to find otherwise, a litigant would have to affirmatively prove 
that this thing which quacks like a duck is in fact a zebra. This has not been 
done and there is reason to believe it is not doable.

That's why folks like me believe we own our IP addresses

Bill -

ARIN has full operational control over the ARIN registry, so if you believe 
that your issued IP address blocks are the rights to specific entries in the 
ARIN registry, then you certainly don’t have any property rights to same. ARIN 
does administer the ARIN registry in accordance with the community-developed 
policies. and that enforcement includes revocations of address space from 
parties for reasons other than non-payment.

If you believe that your “IP addresses” are something other than the assigned 
rights to entries in the ARIN registry, then that’s fine - many people in this 
world have interesting beliefs, but that doesn’t affect in the least the 
ability of ARIN to administer its registry per the community-developed policies.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers




_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to