I think John already provided good information about this topic in the other message. What I have to say is that people believe in what normally makes them feel better, not necessarily in what it really is.

The RIR Registry has ways to enforce its policies and is backed for that, even if it happens to have to go to court. Not only lack of payment may revoke someone's space but also lack of justification. People may not know that the RIR may ask anyone to justify their usage for the allocation if they believing one is stockpiling. And if the company fails to justify they will be revoked. It is simple as that. That's how it has always been, since the early days and is well documented and can be easily found by any technical person or by a judge analyzing a dispute upon this.

Doesn't really matter if there have been many or just few cases, but that there are rules that regulate this and that people previously agreed with them before taking any space from the RIR, so it is enough for a court to rule that RIR is correct in what is being done in such case. One can pay the most expensive lawyer and as a result will only buy him an extra house or car as the RIR is well covered on its action.

Fernando

On 02/05/2019 19:21, William Herrin wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 8:45 AM Fernando Frediani <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Not sure if this is really the main discussion but the point about
    owning IP addresses was an example of something that is actually
    the correct way it works, despite what happens in practice people
    don't own it, cannot sell it (even if they believe they have the
    absolute right to sell - excluding legacy cases). The fact is that
    it CAN be revoked as it is not their property as something that
    you buy.

Fernando,

Respectfully, you can repeat that claim as much as you want but until ARIN actually tries and then survives a precedent-setting court challenge it's just a theory and not, IMHO, a strong one,

As we evaluate the proposal, legal risk is one of the things we'll want to consider. If ARIN tries to enforce a revocation and loses, the policies which permit them to reject registration changes land on much shakier ground. ARIN could end up a pure registry without any policy role despite what its members want. That's one reason the organization has been so reluctant to try.


On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:46 AM John Curran <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > ARIN has full operational control over the ARIN registry, so if you believe that your issued IP address blocks are the rights to specific entries in the ARIN registry, then you certainly don’t have any property rights to same. ARIN does administer the ARIN registry in accordance with the community-developed policies. and that enforcement includes revocations of address space from parties for reasons other than non-payment.
>
> If you believe that your “IP addresses” are something other than the assigned rights to entries in the ARIN registry, then that’s fine - many people in this world have interesting beliefs, but that doesn’t affect in the least the ability of ARIN to administer its registry per the community-developed policies.

John,

I own 199.33.224.0/23 <http://199.33.224.0/23>. That little corner of the Internet address space is mine. If you think ARIN can change its registration such that an ISP will no longer determine from looking up the record that I have the exclusive right to those addresses on the Internet and you think ARIN will survive a suit for tortious interference and whatever else a lawyer and I can come up with as a consequence, go right ahead and change it.

I don't think you can. I'm very confident you won't. ARIN's history in court is one of settlement after settlement, carefully avoiding having the judge set a precedent even when policies had to be stretched to breaking like they were for Microsoft/Nortel.

Actions speak louder than words. ARIN's actions say it's not at all confident it has the power you suggest here. Your actions have credibility. I believe them.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


--
William Herrin ................ [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to