On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:03 AM Michael Peddemors <[email protected]> wrote:
> -1, I appose. > > Anything that further waters down the requirement for a valid abuse > 'email' harms the internet as a whole. We are still waiting for more > ARIN action on invalid data, and more enforcement on the requirement to > respond to abuse reports using the current methods. > Wholeheartedly agree. This is out of scope. We already have a valid abuse approach. Whether it is useful or not is irrelevant: this proposal won't fix or improve it regardless. Read the "Problem Statement" https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/proposals/2021/ARIN_prop_303_orig/ There are also legal and liability implications. There may not be any for ARIN, there are some for network operators. I don't see a single benefit to spending time on such a proposal. This also caught my eye: *Timetable for implementation:* Whenever Must not be that important after all. -1 Warm regards, -M<
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
