On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:59 PM Amy Potter <[email protected]> wrote: > Opinions were fairly divided here, but it sounds like a decent > number of you may be open to or prefer if we made adding > an abuse URL optional, and keeping the abuse POC as mandatory. > I've edited the text of this draft policy in that direction. > Please let me know what you think.
Howdy, I think it's a fiction that folks providing an abuse URL will do more than put a recorded message at the abuse POC. But as far as I can tell, the only difference between that and the abuse POC situation today is that folks reporting abuse will be able to get the URL directly from ARIN instead of having to first consult recorded messages in random formats that might or might not be in good working order. As it improves on the existing situation, I SUPPORT the proposal as adjusted. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
