On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:18 PM Matthew Petach <[email protected]> wrote: > Note that if there's actual indications of wrongdoing, we already > have a means to file a complaint with ARIN, as John has repeatedly > pointed out.
Hi Matthew, I think maybe you missed my point. We don't know how ARIN would treat Ronald's information if filed in a formal complaint and can't rationally discuss whether that enforcement is consistent with our policy-level expectations because ARIN doesn't publish enough details about the complaints, their investigations and the results. There ought to be a way to open that black box without unduly harming the folks who get investigated. Like making it all public upon the investigation's conclusion when all the information is on the table. Upon finding the complaint unsubstantiated, ARIN could even offer the registrant the opportunity to redact anything they considered a trade secret before publication. We'd still end up with a heck of a lot more information and quite possibly enough information to inform a policy discussion. Regards, Bill Herrin -- For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
