On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:49 PM Matthew Petach <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 2:35 PM William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Like making it all public upon the >> investigation's conclusion when all the information is on the table. >> Upon finding the complaint unsubstantiated, ARIN could even offer the >> registrant the opportunity to redact anything they considered a trade >> secret before publication. We'd still end up with a heck of a lot more >> information and quite possibly enough information to inform a policy >> discussion.
> if no fault is found, I don't think it's appropriate to have to > release documents or records that were used to demonstrate > innocence unless those documents or records had already > previously been made public > How many of us have staff people we can spare to go through > hundreds or thousands of pages of documents to redact material > that was provided to ARIN in confidence before it gets published > to the world? Hi Matthew, The picture in my head was of an ARIN-written report running to no more than a few pages describing the key accusations and evidence supporting or refuting them. Specific but abridged. Where fault was not found (or was corrected to ARIN's satisfaction) the registrant would have the opportunity to redact anything in the report they considered a trade secret. Of course, the choice of redaction would also inform the policy debate but then the information that an organization can keep private while justifying IP addresses is also a matter for a healthy public policy debate. Regards, Bill Herrin -- For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
