In message <CAEmG1=rC=mmkdnponcu0yfn3d2mlvygzq2tfevobzgsr4pb...@mail.gmail.com> Matthew Petach <[email protected]> wrote:
>But if no fault is found, I don't think it's appropriate to have to >release documents or records that were used to demonstrate >innocence... I agree 100% with that when it comes to anything that could reasonably be construed as "trade secret" or "proprietary" or "business confidential". As I have stated at some length, I *do not* agree with that when it comes to identifying the name, location and other contact details about the business (and/or the natural person) that is the member, and when it comes to identifying the names and full contact information of any and all officers, directors, shareholders, and/or legal representatives of any given member that are known to ARIN. All of that information for *all* members should *already* be out on the table, and public, totally independent of any cases of "fishy facts". Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
