That would be a very substantial change. It should be proposed separately. I don't see the point of making changes to definitions that aren't referenced anywhere. If you want to add a new definition in order to more clearly make a substantive policy change, then that definition (and the text referencing it) should be included in the substantive policy proposal. If we decide not to make the substantive change, we don't need to change definitions either.
-Scott On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:22 AM Pellak, Kaitlyn via ARIN-PPML < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello PPML, > > I am soliciting any additional feedback the community may have on the > below policy. Please note, we received one comment suggesting that rather > than using the term "2.18 Reserved IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses" we could > instead use the term "Defined Purpose IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses." If anyone > in the community feels this is better language (or has a suggestion for > different language) please respond accordingly. > > If the community are able to agree on language surrounding a definition > there would be subsequent policies to update the language in the NRPM to > match. The author provided an example of what that may look like as follows: > > "Section 4.3.2 > > Change paragraph 1 text > FROM: “End-user organizations without an IPv4 allocation from ARIN qualify > for > an initial allocation of ARIN’s minimum allocation size.” > TO: “End-user organizations without a Reserved (or Defined Purpose) IPv4 > allocation > from ARIN qualify for an initial allocation of ARIN’s minimum allocation > size.”" > > Given the lack of responses we've received thus far I would also like to > pose the question to the community: do you feel that this is a policy the > AC should continue to work on? > > Again, if the community feels strongly one way or another please respond > in the PPML so we can gain a sense of whether or not this policy has > community support. > > Much appreciated, > Kaitlyn > > Kaitlyn Pellak > Amazon – Technical Business Developer II > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 301.921.5566 > > > > > > > > > > On 12/13/24, 1:42 PM, "ARIN-PPML on behalf of ARIN" < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf > of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > > > > The following Draft Policy has been revised: > > > * ARIN-2024-7: Addition of Definitions for General and Special Purpose IP > Addresses > > > Revised text is below and can be found at: > > > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2024_7/ < > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2024_7/> > > > You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will > evaluate the discussion to assess the conformance of this Draft Policy with > ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the > Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are: > > > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration > * Technically Sound > * Supported by the Community > > > > > The PDP can be found at: > > > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/ < > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/> > > > > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > > > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/ < > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/> > > > > > Regards, > > > Eddie Diego > Policy Analyst > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2024-7: Addition of Definitions for General and Special > Purpose IP Addresses > > > Problem Statement: > > > The Number Resource Policy Manual (NRPM) often treats general purpose and > special purpose IP addresses differently. Unfortunately, we don’t have a > convenient to use term to describe these categories, so policy often > becomes either excessively wordy or does not correctly capture the intent. > Examples of this can be found in section 4.1.8 of the NRPM, and in > (currently pending) Draft Policies ARIN-2023-8 (where the fact that 4.4 and > 4.10 space isn’t counted against an organization is repeated numerous > times) and ARIN-2022-12 (where the text does not exclude 4.4 and 4.10 > allocations from being counted against an organization, but it is the > intent that those allocations should be ignored). Additionally, temporary > allocations under section 11 are rarely carved out, even when 4.4 and 4.10 > are, even though it is likely the policy’s intent that these too should be > ignored. > > > Policy Statement: > > > Add the following definition to Section 2 > > > 2.18 Reserved IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses > Addresses that are reserved by ARIN for specific purposes including, but > not limited to; maintaining critical infrastructure, facilitating IPv6 > deployment, or temporary experimental purposes as approved by ARIN. > > > Timetable for Implementation: Immediate. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml < > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml> > Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any > issues. > > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
