On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:03 PM Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO anyone with a use for a new definition should propose their new > policy text, along with the supporting definition, as a new proposal, > and we should abandon this one.
Hi Scott, Speaking only for myself, this seems short sighted to me. You're asking some future proposal to take on dual roles: defining a class of allocations that may only be used for the original purpose and establishing criteria such an allocation. It's hard enough to get consensus on a proposal that does just one thing instead of two. Having a definition on the books, so to speak, would make it easier for a future proposal laying out criteria for an allocation to be clear and concise, both of which are demands from the PDP's section 1.4.1. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
