This wordsmithing appears not to solve any current or potential issues, but it also would create some complications.
First, the definition of "Reserved IP Address". Some people will get confused by it, others will insist on using different terminology and we will see new proposals for it. Second, it adds constrains on qualification for initial allocation. The market already dictates this and while I don't see the situation changing, if does change, we will either going to have to update NRPM or be constrained by it. Current definition is quiet ubiquitous and I see no reason moving forward with this changes. > "Section 4.3.2 > > Change paragraph 1 text > FROM: “End-user organizations without an IPv4 allocation from ARIN qualify for > an initial allocation of ARIN’s minimum allocation size.” > TO: “End-user organizations without a Reserved (or Defined Purpose) IPv4 > allocation > from ARIN qualify for an initial allocation of ARIN’s minimum allocation > size.”" -- Roman V Tatarnikov | https://linkedin.com/in/rtatarnikov
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
