On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > considered my phrasing short, effective and direct. I do not > see, why lkcl should limit my free speech on such a minor thing. > I should not have gotten the request in the first place.
but you *aren't* free, ron - not in this case. this is not a forum for "free speech". you are here because you are a guest of mine, where i get to set the rules - not you. you are required to respect Copyright Law - which applies SPECIFICALLY to EOMA68 - and you are NOT free to do whatever you like. you seem to believe that you have the right to do whatever you want: you don't. every time i have asked you to respect my authority you have ducked or ignored the question. now, i am going to ask you a REALLY simple question, and i am going to REQUIRE that you explicitly answer. do you, ron wirring, accept that i am the SOLE EXCLUSIVE Copyright Holder of the EOMA68 Standard? please answer simply yes or no. if you do not answer "yes" within 72 hours i will be forced to simply unsubscribe you from this list as your continued - long-standing - lack of respect for my authority can reasonably be interpreted to be a threat not just to the project but also to the safety of ordinary non-technical end-users. also if you do not answer "yes" i will NOT grant you permission, AS IS MY RIGHT UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW, to utilise the word "EOMA68" in ANY way, shape or form. are we absolutely clear, ron? l. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
