On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:09 PM, <ronwirr...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
> considered my phrasing short, effective and direct. I do not
> see, why lkcl should limit my free speech on such a minor thing.
> I should not have gotten the request in the first place.
but you *aren't* free, ron - not in this case. this is not a forum
for "free speech". you are here because you are a guest of mine,
where i get to set the rules - not you. you are required to respect
Copyright Law - which applies SPECIFICALLY to EOMA68 - and you are NOT
free to do whatever you like.
you seem to believe that you have the right to do whatever you want: you don't.
every time i have asked you to respect my authority you have ducked
or ignored the question.
now, i am going to ask you a REALLY simple question, and i am going
to REQUIRE that you explicitly answer.
do you, ron wirring, accept that i am the SOLE EXCLUSIVE Copyright
Holder of the EOMA68 Standard?
please answer simply yes or no.
if you do not answer "yes" within 72 hours i will be forced to simply
unsubscribe you from this list as your continued - long-standing -
lack of respect for my authority can reasonably be interpreted to be a
threat not just to the project but also to the safety of ordinary
also if you do not answer "yes" i will NOT grant you permission, AS
IS MY RIGHT UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW, to utilise the word "EOMA68" in ANY
way, shape or form.
are we absolutely clear, ron?
arm-netbook mailing list email@example.com
Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk