> Sachs has popularized a strong finding: Distance from the equator > explains a great deal of the variation in income *levels* between > countries. The further from the equator, the richer countries are. So how do you explain the ancient Mayan, Azctec, Inca, Egyptian, Zimbabwe, and East Indian civilizations? This "finding" seems to be a historical concidence stemming from Europe having firearms and conquering the tropics. Fred Foldvary
- RE: Growth, Wealth, and Race James Sproule
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Krist van Besien
- RE: Growth, Wealth, and Race Gray, Lynn
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race John Cunningham
- RE: Growth, Wealth, and Race dmccarthy
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Krist van Besien
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Girard
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Ananda Gupta
- Re[2]: Growth, Wealth, and Race Fred Foldvary
- Re[2]: Growth, Wealth, and Race Alexandre
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race John Cunningham
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Maria Pia Paganelli
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Fred Foldvary
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race fabio guillermo rojas
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david mitchinson