Great points, Prasad, very well articulated and thoughtful.  I completely agree 
with you.  For those who are complaining of the boomy sound in Blue, would 
turning the bass control on your player down a notch help and maybe tweaking 
the treble and mid range?  I myself don't find the need to re-adjust EQ 
settings for each song.

I find Blue's sound to be very crisp and bright, despite being recorded louder, 
but not too loud IMO.  Personal taste and music medium may have a great impact 
on perception, as pointed out by Prasad.



--- In [email protected], Prasad Varma <svspva...@...> wrote:
>
> I am glad we are having a civilized discussion here on the group despite 
> having major differences of opinion on the sound quality.
> 
> Wired Beats - Before I address your opinion let me chime in that I really 
> enjoy your remixes and have downloaded all of them and made them an integral 
> part of my ARR collection. I like the way you treat the tracks with respect 
> and care and embellish them without disturbing the essence or the soul of the 
> tracks.
> 
> While loudness war has been debated previously too on this forum, I am 
> thinking we are barking at the wrong tree . What some of the folks like Gomzy 
> and Arun Kumar have been complaining is that the tracks sound mangled or 
> cluttered and that's the precise issue I am having trouble getting  my arms 
> around. To me it's the opposite. Despite having several tracks of 
> instruments/sounds I am able to listen to all them very clearly. Using a 
> Video term, I'd rate the resolution of the soundtrack very high (HD 1080p :-) 
> :-)) . And comparison with Dil Se may not be appropriate given the acoustic 
> nature of that album with far fewer layers as opposed to very technoish/multi 
> dimensional sound of Blue.
> 
> But I do respect the diametrically opposite viewpoint and in trying to 
> reconcile the opinions I can think of a couple of reasons:
> 
> 1) Unless all of us are using Studio Monitors, we are not on a level playing 
> field here. I am not talking about expensive vs cheap equipment but rather 
> the distinct sonic reproductive traits of amplifiers/speakers.
> 
> The same CD sounds differently to me when I listen to it on my Definitve 
> Technology Bipolar speakers (boomy, rich in bass) as opposed to my JBL's 
> which are a lot brighter and I am not even throwing the receivers into the 
> mix here. I have done all my Blue listening on my ipod and car stereo and I 
> find the sound extremely crisp and vibrant without sounding shrill.
> 
> I am assuming that your equipment for some reason is not a perfect sonic 
> match to the sound created for Blue.
> 
> 2) It also might simply boil down to something as simple as personal taste. I 
> am probably liking what I am hearing and you guys are not (from a pure sound 
> pesrpective)
> 
> It would be helpful if someone can pinpoint the exact selections from the 
> album that sound jammed/muddled to you to help me better understand where you 
> are coming from and no Chiggy Wiggy doesn't count given the intrinsic rhytm 
> heavy nature of the track :-) :-)
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: ichord <purev...@...>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:09:49 PM
> Subject: [arr] Re: This might explain BLUE's audio quality - Loudness War!
> 
>   
> The density of arrangements of sound and instruments is high and the sonic 
> texture is bright and loud, but I don't find the overall sound cluttered and 
> jammed....I can clearly distinguish each track separately and distinctly. 
> Rahman added a lot of layers to the songs, and due to the combination of 
> density, loudness, and brightness, some here are finding that to be too 
> overwhelming I guess.
> 
> In any case, I hope that does not diminish people's enjoyment of the songs 
> themselves, which are awesome to me.
> 
> --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, wiredbeats <wiredbeats@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > :) I am sure you are not halucinating. Even metallica's Death Magnetic 
> > sounds good. but its been rated very bad for sound quality. Mettalica fans 
> > have even gone to the extent of pushing for a full remasting. I am NOT 
> > saying Blue is like that. I agree with few who say Blue could have been 
> > better. The music is great but should have breathed more. 
> > 
> > Its not 'THAT BAD' Its good.
> > 
> > check this http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=3Gmex_4hreQ 
> > 
> > regards
> > 
> > wb 
> > 
> > Remixes I Originals I Opinions at http://www.wiredbea ts.com 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > From: ichord <purevibz@ .>
> > To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com
> > Sent: Friday, 11 September, 2009 1:47:50 AM
> > Subject: [arr] Re: This might explain BLUE's audio quality - Loudness War!
> > 
> > 
> > Wow, I am really, really surprised at how mnay people here think that the 
> > audio quality of Blue is compressed and jammed.....wow. .....I don't hear 
> > it at all...unless I'm hallucinating sounds that are not there!!! 
> > 
> > --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, wiredbeats <wiredbeats@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > > 
> > > For those of who don;t know this There is a problem in the music 
> > > reproduction industry where companies either compel the mastering folks 
> > > or do it in-house . They take the dynamic compression to its heights. 
> > > This jumbles layers and clogs the space with too much in too little. The 
> > > crispness goes away and but volume is high and the thump is well..super. 
> > > Very club ready. Thats why i think Pritam's music is so bass heavy and 
> > > freakishly loud.
> > > 
> > > This is called Loudness war and music composers are not to be blammed. 
> > > This explains why we see a remarkable difference in tracks from 
> > > Sony/Universals and T-series/Big Music etc. I bought a ( may be the 10th 
> > > copy) of Dil Se along with Blue. Dil Se for the same volume sounds 
> > > stunningly clear.. Blue sounds jammed ( sorry folks ). The songs are 
> > > great no doubt but all this discussion might just have a valid point.
> > > 
> > > I really think T-series should treat Rahman's master tracks differently, 
> > > not just in final packaging but also reproduction. They should not treat 
> > > it like any other bollywood music. Rahman's are by far quite complex!
> > > 
> > > Check out more on what i am sayin 
> > > 
> > > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Loudness_ war 
> > > 
> > > Remixes I Originals I Opinions at http://www.wiredbea ts.com 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > From cricket scores to your friends. Try the Yahoo! India Homepage! 
> > > http://in.yahoo. com/trynew
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. 
> > Download Now! http://messenger. yahoo.com/ download. php
> >
>


Reply via email to