I stand corrected...thanks
Kyle
Rick Cook wrote:
**
As have I. If my client can't perform certain functions because they
don't yet exist on the server version, that's probably not a problem,
since I'm not supposed to have that functionality anyway. If my
server has functionality my client can't process, that's a potential
problem.
I always recommend upgrading client before server, for that and other
reasons.
Rick
On 1/23/07, *Axton* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
**
I've always assumed the opposite in the case of the user tool.
Axton Grams
On 1/23/07, *Kyle Whitley* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I wanted to know for a lot of the reasons Robert mentioned. I
always
thought it was better to use an older client against a new
server ( 5.1.2
client against 6.3 server) not vice versa. Is this not true?
Thanks
Kyle
Kern, Robert SBA wrote:
> **
> As to why this might (w/o really wanting it to) happen ... I
think
> especially at larger international environments, also with
people
> connecting to different Remedy systems from different
providers within
> the same company, it can happen that there some users still
have old
> clients ... *shrugs*
>
> It then may not be that easy to update all clients for sure,
also
> limiting access by API version might be difficult as well
(perhaps the
> "old" client is needed for a different system, or that Admin
might
> shoot you in the leg if you break that client of this user
who had
> that installed). SMS may not be available everywhere as well.
>
> Also with that user Joe in Bangalore or Hong Kong with his
notebook,
> who connects to Remedy once each second month and just does
not care
> about updating :-)
>
>
> Suppose as long as it does not "break" anything, it would be
ok (if it
> would, then perhaps you need to limit the connectable
version after
> all). "Why" ... it just happens :-)
>
>
> Cheers, Robert
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
*On Behalf Of *Dave Barber
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:01 AM
> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: 5.x User Client Against 7.x AR Server
>
> **
> Biggest question would be "why would you want to use a 5.x
client
> against a 7.x server?".
>
> I can sorta understand using a later client (at my last
place we had a
> good few people using the 6.3 client against our 5.1.1
server, as it
> handled search results considerably better), but not the
other way round.
>
> Regards
>
> Dave
>
>
> On 22/01/07, *Kyle Whitley* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
wrote:
>
> Anyone know if the 5.x user client will work against a
7.x AR
> Server? I
> know it wouldn't be officially supported.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kyle
>
> --
> Kyle Whitley
> IT System Support Professional
> Office of Information and Instructional Technology (OIIT)
> Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
>
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
www.arslist.org <http://www.arslist.org/>
> < http://www.arslist.org <http://www.arslist.org/>>
ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
>
>
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted
with HTML
> in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was
submitted
> with HTML in it___
--
Kyle Whitley
IT System Support Professional
Office of Information and Instructional Technology (OIIT)
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in it___
--
Kyle Whitley
IT System Support Professional
Office of Information and Instructional Technology (OIIT)
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers
Are"
