If you install 1.6 then don't go above upgrade 3 if you are using ars web
services and ARS 7.1 as the plugin will fail with a message about not
being able to determine the minor Java version.


> Java 1.5 = Java 5.0.  They changed the numbering mechanism starting with
> v5/1.5.  Sort of like Solaris did when they went from 2.6 to 7.0 (which
> was
> really 2.7).
>
> Anyway, like Chris said, any 1.5 version above _12 will probably work, and
> there's probably no reason to not get the most current one of those.  But
> unless you like a challenge and the occasional surprise, you might avoid
> Java 6 for now.
>
> Rick
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Richard Copits <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>> Are these both saying the same thingÂ….???? I think I'm more
>> confusedÂ….???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Your best bet is to load the 1.5.0_14+ JDK on both the mid-tier server
>> (which requires it) and the AR Server (which can get by with the JRE)
>> since
>> some of the functions that can reside on the AR Server also need the
>> JDK.
>> Avoid 1.6 unless you take pleasure in obscure java errors."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "AR System (Server and Mid-Tier) 7.1.00 requires Java 5.0 or higher."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Portions of this message may be confidential under an exemption to
>> Ohio's
>> public records law or under a legal privilege. If you have received this
>> message in error or due to an unauthorized transmission or interception,
>> please delete all copies from your system without disclosing, copying,
>> or
>> transmitting this message.
>> __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>> html___
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to