Hello Drew,
 
No I am not and I found a backdoor fix to it.. If you modify the Navigation 
Categories after creating them, it seems to break the relationships between the 
parent category and the child in the Reference Category form.. I had to 
manually fix the instance Id's in this form after I noticed this to remove the 
duplicate from appearing in the Service Catalog list..
 
I'm still perfecting the best way to do this :-) will resume tomorrow..
 
Thanks for your help though.. Appreciate it..
 
Joe


----- Original Message ----
From: Drew Shuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:28:53 PM
Subject: Re: Data load tool for Service Request Management 2.2

** 
Joe, make sure you're not confusing the Navigational Category form with the 
Browse for Service Details form. This may be why you have duplicates. 
 
Drew
Tulsa, OK
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 5:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Data load tool for Service Request Management 2.2

** 
Might not be too hard to build one..
 
Anyway did anyone of you have problems where the borad Navigation Category got 
duplicated in the Request Entry console?
 
What I had done was entered a few Navigation categories and before adding SRD's 
felt the need to modify some of the Navigational Categories..
 
After modifying them, where the first tier was changed, it dupliacted two sets 
of the first tier, one containing all the older subcategories, and the other 
containing the newly entered subcategories..
 
Where is this list of Service Categories being read from? I know the 
navigational categories is where you configure them, but obviously its not 
reading this list from there directly..
 
Joe



----- Original Message ----
From: Mahesh Chandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:03:34 PM
Subject: Re: Data load tool for Service Request Management 2.2

** 
We will be very much interested if there is any such tool and I agree with you, 
as a developer it is really a night mare doing the Data configuration work. 
 
I wish there was some Data Wizard tool to do this.
 
Regards
Mahesh

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Joe DeSouza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

** 
Thank you Mahesh..

I was hoping for a tool to import the rest to make life a bit easier! I wonder 
if it would be too hard to build such a tool from scratch than to enter 900 
billion configuration records by hand :-) Okay its not that much but you know 
what I mean.. 200 is a lot too and a lot more uninteresting to do manually than 
developing some ARS code to facilitate the same thing..

Are you or anyone reading this post, aware of any 'behind the curtains' kind of 
a document about SRM that may be useful if one were to attempt to build such 
tools?
Joe



----- Original Message ----
From: Mahesh Chandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 5:35:11 PM
Subject: Re: Data load tool for Service Request Management 2.2

** 
Hi Joe
 
If the environment is a mix and match, it is possible to import the 
Navigational Categories, Work Order Templates and Task templates but not the 
SRD's, PDTS and AOTs. (Ref: Page 324 of SRM 2.2 Admin Guide)
 
In our case, it was ITSP 3 Request Management to ITSM SRM 2.2. We had to 
manually create AOT's and associate the Work Order Template to the AOT, then 
create PDT and SRD.
 
Thanks
Mahesh

 
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Joe DeSouza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

** 
I have some data for Navigational Categories, SRD's, Item details with SRD's, 
etc given to me in the form of a excel spreadsheet..

Is there a tool available for data load for SRM 2.2 configuration data? Or is 
it pretty much something that I may need to build myself?

Joe




_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to