I think prudence would call for one or more of these in future responses: 1) A response from someone who can speak for Turing. 2) Responses that are more than rumors. Rumors can cause damage to relationships of all kinds, and it would be unfortunate if Turing's were damaged for false reasons. If you don't have evidence to back up your rumor, prudence would dictate keeping it to yourself. 3) Not assuming something bad about Turing unless and until evidence appears to support those assumptions.
Rick On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I heard they were in financial trouble and owe money (Allegedly, to > contractors and their major suppliers). They are no longer a solutions > partner and can only provide consultancy. If I had any business with > these guys I would be worried!!! > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
