go out to www.cm-ug.org and bmcdn as well, and check stuff out.
There is alot of information..
between BIM / CM / CDI / AIE / TD there are 22,000 pages of documentation.



On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:11 PM, patrick zandi <remedy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't get me wrong, I love the stuff, product is pretty good,
> But there are alot of little things that will kill ya.
> there are alot of little things that just do not work very well in a real
> work scenario and I am convinced
> of a bunch of upgrade and fix actions still could be done with these
> products..
> I run into something every week.
>
> like setting up an adam on the cm server and then setting up the ad
> syncronization to the real ad domain
> because you have to run an LDIF script to modify the AD network and
> security will not let you do it.
> That is another time consuming process, with it's little details../.
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:05 PM, patrick zandi <remedy...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> </Rant>
>> Another thing with the CMDB -- to CM -- Integrations is the server fallout
>> of information.
>> I am have some issues with the multiple nic / cm agent output into the
>> cmdb.
>> For example: Server A have 5 nics all at 10 gbs of so.
>> so now I get hostnames of the following in the cmdb.
>> Hostname
>> Hostname-bur
>> Hostname-mgt
>> Hostname-pri
>> Hostname-back
>> Then TD comes in and I also get
>> Hostname:Domain.name
>> IP
>> ----------------------- Reason
>> Each hostname is connected to a different nic, so it is a different item.
>> Each IP is individual if you cannot access the box -- which you need sudo
>> rights and a global account (security risk -- not allowed)
>> TD: has no ability to do multiple TD's Multi-tenecy -- It says it does..
>> but it is a Manual Process..
>>   you have to change the company, and then shutdown the service and start
>> the service backup (which cannot be done without a  RFC -- Request for
>> change -- Change request) and then scan and syncronized, Then change the
>> name to the next co. and start process all over again.
>> CM-- latest agents for 7.2 is java 1.4.2_19 JRE Run (insecure -- java
>> already hacked, and insecure) so this means you have to have 7.5 -- but that
>> means you have to have ARS 7.5, ITSM 7.5, CMDB 7.5, AIE 7.5, DSL 7.5, CDI
>> 7.5, and Oh, there are about 12 little bugs that you have to know about,
>> like -- if you are using oracle with AIE and CDI then on a Tues with a full
>> moon, ensure you are standing on 1 leg and barking but like a chow chow, not
>> like a coyote..  ERRRRrrrr
>> --------/Rant
>> P.S See previous rant about how engineering is behind..
>>
>> OH, and if you have plans of 2008 server Windows.. you might want to wait,
>> (or you have no choice) as the compatibility is almost 0.
>> ---/Finally
>>
>> just thought I would mention it..
>>
>> CM is on 8.0 now as well, (consider it a finial release) as Bladelogic is
>> the main beast for CM now...
>>
>> and there is not just an HOSTNAME
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM, strauss <stra...@unt.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> We are trying to build this out for our site as we upgrade from 7.1 to
>>> 7.5 in another case where we don't have Asset Mgmt, and have already seen a
>>> number of issues:
>>>
>>> 1. The Topology Discovery and Foundation Discovery 1.6 product only works
>>> with 7.1, not 7.5.
>>>
>>> 2. The 7.5 version is called BMC Atrium Discovery and Dependency Mapping
>>> (ADDM) and replaces the other two mainly in that it is a single
>>> installation; it is required to work with CMDB 7.5.
>>>
>>> 3. <RANT> We just purchased the Topology Discovery and Foundation
>>> Discovery product, downloaded 1.6, then found we needed the newer version to
>>> work with 7.5, and THEN were told that it is a "different" product
>>> (horse#*%^) and that we did not have access to it (7.5 was released while
>>> our Discovery purchase was being processed).  If you read the ADDM 7.5 docs
>>> they show clearly that is the upgrade AND BUG FIX for the earlier 1.6
>>> product, so no, it is the same product, just renamed and renumbered like
>>> everything else in the BMC stable.  So, buyer beware - they are trying to
>>> run a shell game on us here. </RANT>
>>>
>>> 4. The db for either one of these products must be case sensitive. Most
>>> of use running ARS against SQL Server have never even installed it with case
>>> sensitive collation, so I plan to set up a separate SQL Server just for
>>> Discovery; I can't use any of my existing servers which are all case
>>> insensitive.
>>>
>>> 5. BMC docs indicate that Discovery should be on its own server, separate
>>> from ARS and anything else, and that the db should be separate; my plan is
>>> to put the SQL Server and Discovery server on a dedicated box, at least at
>>> first, if we can ever get to the 7.5 code.
>>>
>>> Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
>>> Call Tracking Administration Manager
>>> University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
>>> http://itsm.unt.edu/
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>>> arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Opela, Gary L CTR USAF AFMC 72
>>> CS/SCBAH
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:56 PM
>>> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>>> Subject: Re: CMDB and Discovery
>>>
>>> One more thing, can the discovery server be the same piece of hardware
>>> as the discovery server?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gary Opela, Jr.
>>> Sr. Remedy Engineer
>>> Avaya Phone Admin
>>> RSP Cert, Sec+
>>> 405 739 7006 x30043
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
>>> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Matt Ferrigno
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:44 PM
>>> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>>> Subject: Re: CMDB and Discovery
>>>
>>> ** One other thing worth mentioning.  The Configuration Discovery
>>> integration relies on items that are installed with EIE.  When I did the
>>> integration, it failed because we only had AIE installed (which left out
>>> some of the original EIE components).  The answer was installing EIE and
>>> then upgrading to AIE before performing the Configuration Discovery
>>> Integration.  This was a bug in the install process and I'm not sure if
>>> it has been addressed yet.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Matt Ferrigno
>>> <matthew.ferri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        The answer depends on what discovery tool you plan to use.
>>> Here's the answer for the two that I know.
>>>
>>>        Foundation Discovery/Topology Discovery:
>>>        AR Server
>>>        CMDB
>>>        FD/TD
>>>        DSL (A local copy of the DSL is also installed on the Discovery
>>> Server, the versions of DSL need to match on the Discovery and AR
>>> servers)
>>>
>>>        Configuration Discovery:
>>>        AR Server
>>>        CMDB
>>>        Configuration Discovery
>>>        AIE
>>>        DSL (Configuration Discovery does not require a local install of
>>> the DSL on the Discovery server as it looks to DSL on the AR Server for
>>> normalization)
>>>
>>>        I believe these products have now been combined into a single
>>> product, in which case I would imagine they would use AIE to pull data
>>> into the CMDB and also utilize the DSL on the AR Server for
>>> normalization.
>>>
>>>        Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Roger Justice
>>> <rjust2...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>                ** CMDB needs AR Server since it is an ARS application.
>>> All Reconciliation mapping are installed when you do the Discovery
>>> integration to CMDB. The data is passed from Discovery to CMDB using
>>> CMDB API calls
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                -----Original Message-----
>>>                From: Opela, Gary L CTR USAF AFMC 72 CS/SCBAH
>>> <gary.opela....@tinker.af.mil>
>>>                To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>>>                Sent: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:56 pm
>>>                Subject: CMDB and Discovery
>>>
>>>
>>>                **
>>>                BMC Remedy 7.1
>>>
>>>                Hello all. I am curious as to what all is required if I
>>> were to want to use BMC Discovery to populate the CMDB?
>>>
>>>                Would I only need CMDB, Discovery, and DSL, or would
>>> there be additional utilities or tools required (other than the obvious,
>>> such as arserver)?
>>>
>>>                I am mainly looking to get the data into the CMDB. I'm
>>> not concerned about presenting it in Asset Management at this point,
>>> only in populating the CMDB.
>>>
>>>                Thanks,
>>>
>>>                Gary Opela, Jr.
>>>                Sr. Remedy Engineer
>>>                Avaya Phone Admin
>>>                RSP Cert, Sec+
>>>                405 739 7006 x30043
>>>
>>>                _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist:
>>> "Where the Answers Are"_
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>>                Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop
>>> Dell's full line of laptops.
>>> <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222399266x1201456865/aol?redir
>>> =http:%2F%2Fad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B215073777%3B37034343%3Bf>
>>>                _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist:
>>> "Where the Answers Are"_
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
>>> Are"_
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>>> Platinum 
>>> Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net<sponsor%3armisoluti...@verizon.net>ARSlist:
>>>  "Where the Answers Are"
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
>>> Platinum 
>>> Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net<sponsor%3armisoluti...@verizon.net>ARSlist:
>>>  "Where the Answers Are"
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Zandi
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Patrick Zandi
>



-- 
Patrick Zandi

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to