Just my 2 cents - if I was uncomfortable with a couple items and it seemed a bit strange, it probably wouldn't be worth pursuing.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Hallenger Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 9:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Recruiters Odd NDA ** I probably jumped the gun a little. On first read it seemed to be saying that I was not allowed to look for a job anywhere while they are shopping my resume around. Which sounded ridiculous. Now they are asking for my SS# and have not even interviewed my. I dunno, I'm just uncomfortable with this one.. _____ From: Lisa Singh <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 8:00 AM Subject: Re: Recruiters Odd NDA On 8/1/13, Roger Justice <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > It is a non compete which is almost impossible to get a lawyer to take you > to court for. If you live in a right to work state, which I do I have seen > this tried and the court through it out. > I was going to post the same thing - non compete clauses are fairly (well were) over here in the UK, but are utterly unenforceable. Double check the NM law you're worried, but I wouldn't worry overly. Lisa ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org <http://www.arslist.org/> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
