Hi!
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:47:37PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> In my opinion, the default asciidoc vim file must provide the best user
> experience as possible, this means showing bold as bold, italic as italic,
...
> However if your view is the consensus then I don't mind maintaining my own.
I don't see any conflict here. Syntax file shouldn't include this, but we
can provide both asciidoc's syntax and colorscheme as separate files.
Main issue with colorscheme is what it should be very different for at
least 3 use cases - Vim on limited 8-16 color text terminals, Vim on
modern 256-color text terminals and GVim. Because it doesn't makes much
sense to use italic in first two cases where it doesn't really looks like
"italic" anyway.
--
WBR, Alex.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
