Title: Re: [Assam] Begalis and MIT
Hi Mayur:

You took the easy road of following Rajen. I was hoping you would do a whole lot better. But as long as you did, and assuming that is the best we have to go with for the moment, let us look at Rajen's, and now yours too, problem statement:

1) The North East India is under developed compared to the rest of the country and compared to its natural resources. Within the North East, Assam is even lagging behind in development compared to the other states in the North East.
2) Compared to the rest of the country, the Assam has the problem of heaviest infiltration of illegal immigration which has been going one since 1930s.
3) Compared to the rest of the country, North East has the highest level of Corruption. Assam may be the worst.


*** First off, they are not problem statements. They are descriptions of SYMPTOMS, arising out of certain PROBLEMS which would require fixing to make Assam the state of your ideals.

Therefore, you all still need to find what the PROBLEMs are, and how your solution concept does or is expected to address the problems.

You can take one issue at a time. And take your time. I will be looking forward to learning a whole lot.

Best.

cm








At 5:33 AM -0800 11/21/05, mayur bora wrote:
Mahanta-da, by and large I agree with Rajen-da's list
of problems plaguing Assam.

Mayur



--- Barua25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Let me try to help:
> We have these problems, in summary:
> 1) The North East India is under developed compared
> to the rest of the country and compared to its
> natural resources. Within the North East, Assam is
> even lagging behind in development compared to the
> other states in the North East.
> 2) Compared to the rest of the country, the Assam
> has the problem of heaviest infiltration of illegal
> immigration which has been going one since 1930s.
> 3) Compared to the rest of the country, North East
> has the highest level of Corruption. Assam may be
> the worst.
> 4) Among the North East, Nagaland has the problem of
> insurgency since after 1947 and which is still going
> on.  The reason of insurgency in Nagaland is pure
> and simple.  They want independence from India as
> their right.
> Assam also joined this insurgency 40 years after
> independence in 1979. 
> The reason of insurgency in Assam are the 1, 2 & 3
> above.
> Assam has many other problems but the above are the
> main.
> Meghalaya is the only state whic is free from any
> insurgency so far and seem to be happily tagging
> along India.
> So is Mizoram at present.
> RB
>  .  
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: mc mahant
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Cc: [email protected]
>   Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 7:22 PM
>   Subject: Re: [Assam] Begalis and MIT
>
>
>   The Problem Statement is not yet forthcoming from
> anybody!!
>
>   mm
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     From:  Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     To:  mayur bora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [email protected]
>     Subject:  Re: [Assam] Begalis and MIT
>     Date:  Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:20:10 -0600
>     >Hi Mayur:
>     >
>     >Thanks for the reply.
>     >
>     >You gave your idea of a solution here, but WHAT
> is the problem?
>     >
>     >Unless you tell us what you see as the
> problems, how can anyone weigh
>     >if your solution concept addresses them?
>     >
>     >The reason I am asking is that your solution
> concept really did not
>     >address anything of any significance at all.
> But I am willing to
>     >accept that your concept of what the problems
> are is different from
>     >mine. Therefore it is important to have a
> glimpse of your version,
>     >wouldn't you agree? And once we do, we could
> weigh if your analysis
>     >is sound, to be persuaded to it or reject it.
>     >
>     > >  >You will also make a very good politician.
>     > >You know how to engineer a reply by tempting
> people.
>     >
>     >*** Even though you present it as a sly and
> deceitful quality, an
>     >ability to communicate and find common ground
> to solve common
>     >problems ought NOT to  be
>     >treated like you are doing. That is an
> unfortunate attitude, no doubt
>     >born of the pervasive desi-condition in which
> politicians remain
>     >forever unaccountable, leaving even otherwise
> intelligent folks, like
>     >yourself, with a sense of abject resignation.
>     >
>     >But it CAN be changed you know? May not be in
> India in the
>     >foreseeable future. But an Assam, freed from
> the shackles of the
>     >dysfunctional Indian system has every
> opportunity to be  rid of it.
>     >
>     >cm
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >At 8:39 AM -0800 11/20/05, mayur bora wrote:
>     > >Dear Mahanta da
>     > >
>     > >You are not only an intelligent thinker and
> political
>     > >analyst. You will also make a very good
> politician.
>     > >You know how to engineer a reply by tempting
> people.
>     > >Of course I have taken it at the right
> spirit. Thank
>     > >you for your kind words.
>     > >
>     > >On a serious note, can any one be happy with
> dry bread
>     > >? But more importantly, in absence of any
> workable and
>     > >realistic solution, is it not in the larger
> interst of
>     > >the people to enjoy dry bread in stead of
> longing for
>     > >roast meat which is going to create havoc in
> many
>     > >people's lives ? I leave it to you to reflect
> and
>     > >ponder over ihe issue.
>     > >
>     > >Personally I feel a federal structure with
> centre
>     > >retaining defence, finance and external
> affairs and
>     > >rest of  the powers at state lavel can solve
> some
>     > >problems afflicting all the states of the
> country. Of
>     > >course it would be unwise to expect miracles
> overnight
>     > >from such an arrangement. Moreover,
> asymmetrical
>     > >federalism should not be a sacrilegious
> concept
>     > >keeping in mind the different background of
> the states
>     > >before coming together during independence.
> But if
>     > >this arrangement can not improve the
> condition after
>     > >say 10/20 years, all options should be made
> open viz,
>     > >reverting back to the earlier position,
> status quo or
>     > >a more radical arrangement. But it should be
> decided
>     > >by people after a prolonged and unrestricted
> debate.
>     > >Any well meaning and workable concept should
> be
>     > >allowed to be tested before coming to any
> firm
>     > >conclusion.
>     > >
>     > >I am not sure in today's complex world, slow
> and
>     > >steady wins the race or not, but it is safer
> for the
>     > >people. I don't want speed at cost of own
> people's
>     > >blood.
>     > >
>     > >Take care.
>     > >
>     > >Mayur
>     > >
>     > >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>     > >
>     > >>  At 7:34 PM -0800 11/18/05, mayur bora
> wrote:
>     > >>  >**** I don't like to give all my secrets
> out to the
>     > >>  >>  clueless,who are
>     > >>  >>  so  intentionally or otherwise
>     > >>  >
>     > >>  >HA HA HA....
>     > >>  >
>     > >>  >DRY BREAD AT HOME IS BETTER THAN ROAST
> MEAT ABROAD.
>     > >>  >
>     > >>  >Mayur
>     > >>
>     > >>
>     > >>  **** Hi Mayur:
>     > >>
>
=== message truncated ===>
_______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
>
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>



 
               
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to