On 5 November 2014 05:07, Sharuff Morsa3 <sharuff_mo...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > HLASM - like other products can be driven by user requests. The more > requests/votes we have - the higher up the list the requirement goes. > If the community feels this change is important/useful/desirable > then please raise a requirement and vote for it. > It will certainly get my vote. > > see http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21577670
It appears that, as on Facebook, there is a "vote in favour" (Like) button, but no "vote against" (Dislike) option. Other requirements systems offer the choice to oppose the use of limited development time on someone else's requirement that I might find frivolous or just not important. For instance the SHARE requirements system offers a choice between -5 and +5, IIRC. In this particular case (long-displacement end address on USING), there is a very closely related requirement 45346 "Long displacement support for dependant/labeled USINGs" that should surely be implemented with this one. Tony H.
