On 2021-01-21, at 19:07:36, Gary Weinhold wrote:
>
> ... the GET still has a "L 15,24(1)".
>
Is there any harm in that? In days of yore there may have
been a performance penalty, but now?
In a contrived case, it may depend on displacement reach:
USING 5000,2
LA 15,6000(1)
but not:
USING 5000,2
LA 15,6000(,1)
> It also contained CICS macro DFHRMCAL that generated a CSECT statement
> instead of saving and using &SYSSTYP. We were using this macro in RSECTs.
>
Isn't that the long way around instead of:
&SYSLOC LOCTR
???
> So it wasn't all about reentrant code; but it was about a lead
> programmer who wanted all assemblies to end with no errors with all
> warnings flags set, especially for less experienced programmers.
-- gil
